Help us understand our audience.

Do you work for (or with) a local government?

This includes direct employees of local governments, school districts, place-based nonprofits, and foundations.

Strategies
November 13, 2025
Improving access to health care

Improving access to health care

Last Revised: November 13, 2025

Strategy overview

  • Increasing access to health care: When quality health care is easily accessible, individuals, families, and entire communities can see significant health benefits. However, high healthcare costs and a lack of health insurance can deter many low- and moderate-income individuals from seeking medical care. One strategy that combats these dynamics is federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), which are community-based healthcare organizations that provide comprehensive primary care and support services to underserved populations on a sliding fee scale and regardless of insurance status. FQHCs and nonprofit health care organizations that receive government subsidies can provide comprehensive care to underserved areas and populations, increasing the likelihood that uninsured and/or underinsured patients receive care regardless of their ability to pay.

  • Coordinating medical care across specialties: Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMH) are a proven approach to comprehensive, patient-centered, and coordinated care. With PCMH, primary care teams include a wider range of health care professionals and services than in the traditional health care model, allowing patients to directly access a variety of specialist providers along with pharmacists, nutritionists, and others. When patients need specialized care, the primary care team coordinates services with their counterparts across the healthcare system, often with long-term, community-based supports.

  • Connecting patients via mobile clinics and telehealth: Many factors can make it difficult for individuals to access healthcare, including aging, mobility issues, a lack of transportation, and/or fear of leaving home. Mobile health clinics bring health care services to these populations. Using vans and pop-up facilities, these services can provide reproductive health care, medical imaging, substance use treatment, dental and vision care, and refer patients to other providers. Additionally, many patients feel increasingly comfortable with telehealth services that offer virtual or remote health care for a range of health concerns, easing their transportation and mobility challenges, especially in rural areas.

  • Expanding the role of patient navigators: Patient navigators guide patients through the challenges of medical care, insurance, social support systems, and more. Typically, they work one-on-one with patients undergoing time-sensitive and complex treatments (such as cancer care), and they can also be integrated into general primary care teams. Navigators help patients locate specialized providers, schedule appointments, understand medical terms, manage treatment protocols, and apply for and maintain insurance benefits and coverage. They can also offer professional medical interpretation services for those with limited English proficiency.

  • Integrating case managers and social workers: Social workers can provide a range of services to help patients overcome barriers to receiving healthcare services. They often partner with patient navigators to provide resource coordination for patients, advocate on patients’ behalf to receive services, and help patients overcome obstacles to receiving health care. In collaboration with navigators, they can assist patients with insurance and transportation issues, food insecurity, inadequate housing, and offer emotional support for patients facing health challenges.

  • Leveraging community healthcare workers: Community healthcare workers (CHWs) are frontline public health professionals who connect communities and individuals to health and social services and to hospitals and health systems, especially in underserved areas. CHWs have deep knowledge of the communities they serve, enabling them to educate and advocate for patients, promote healthy behaviors, and improve health outcomes.

There is strong evidence that patient navigation programs, Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), and Patient centered medical homes (PCMHs) improve individual health and wellbeing when considering several health outcomes, including access to treatment, pain symptoms, satisfaction with treatment, and cost effectiveness.

  • A 2023 systematic review of Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) identified FQHCs as a scientifically-supported strategy for increasing access to primary care and improved health outcomes. FQHCs are proven to improve continuity of care and delivery of preventive services for low income individuals, especially children and Medicare patients.

  • A 2020 systematic review of Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs) examined 64 studies across several treatment settings. Across all settings, a majority of studies found that PCMHs resulted in cost savings. In government-run facilities, PCMH implementation led to fewer hospitalizations.

  • A 2017 systematic review of 32 studies evaluating Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs) found that patients in PCMH settings had better clinical outcomes, higher treatment adherence rates, and fewer emergency room visits.

  • A 2022 systematic review of patient navigator programs for cancer patients examined over 100 systematic reviews and single program evaluations. This review reported significant improvements in follow-up and treatment adherence rates for cancer patients. This study also found that navigator programs improved access to supportive cancer care, completion of advanced care, and reduced self-reported pain symptoms.

  • A 2023 literature review of 21 studies of different types of patient navigation programs reported that team-based system navigation models demonstrated positive impacts on health service utilization for patients. Findings were mixed for non-medical personnel and health professional-led navigation models.

  • A 2025 experimental study of a patient navigation program for youth with chronic health conditions transitioning to adult care did not find a significant reduction in emergency room visits, but a subset of participants with a high mental health needs did experience a 25% decline in emergency room visits.

  • A 2024 systematic review of 59 studies of patient navigation programs for cancer treatment found that 70% of studies reported an improvement in treatment initiation when using patient navigators and 87% of studies reported that patient navigators resulted in higher patient satisfaction.

  • A 2021 literature review of cancer patient navigation programs from around the world found that 57% of studies reported a reduction in distress, anxiety and/or depression in cancer patients and reduced time to the start of treatment.

  • A 2025 literature review of twenty-seven studies examining family navigation (FN) programs for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) found that FN programs expedited access to services for children with ASD, from initial positive screening to definitive diagnosis and the start of interventions.

Before making investments in this strategy, city and county leaders should ensure it addresses local needs.

The Urban Institute and Mathematica have developed indicator frameworks to help local leaders assess conditions related to upward mobility, identify barriers, and guide investments to address these challenges. These indicator frameworks can serve as a starting point for self-assessment, not as a comprehensive evaluation, and should be complemented by other forms of local knowledge.

The Urban Institute's Upward Mobility Framework identifies a set of key local conditions that shape communities’ ability to advance upward mobility and racial equity. Local leaders can use the Upward Mobility Framework to better understand the factors that improve upward mobility and prioritize areas of focus. Data reports for cities and counties can be created here.

One indicator in the Upward Mobility Framework may be improved with investments in increasing access to health care. To measure this indicator and determine if investments in these interventions could help, examine the following:

Mathematica's Education-to-Workforce (E-W) Indicator Framework helps local leaders identify the data that matter most in helping students and young adults succeed. Local leaders can use the E-W framework to better understand education and workforce conditions in their communities and to identify strategies that can improve outcomes in these areas.

Several indicators in the E-W Framework may be improved with investments in this strategy. To measure these indicators and determine if investments in this strategy could help, examine the following:

  • Access to health, mental health and social supports: Ratio of number workers or students to number of health, mental health, and social services FTE staff (for example, school nurses, psychologists, and social workers).

  • Mental and emotional well-being: Percentage of youth with mental or emotional health needs as identified by a universal screening tool.

  • Physical development and well-being: Percentage of students meeting benchmarks on self-rated surveys of physical health, such as the California Healthy Kids Survey Physical Health & Nutrition module.

  • Childhood experiences: Percentage of individuals with fewer than three adverse childhood experiences (ACEs).

  • Health insurance coverage: Percentage of individuals with health insurance or percentage of eligible individuals (children or adults) enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP.

  • Prioritizing community engagement: Building trust between communities and health care providers increases the likelihood that individuals will seek care. Engaging with residents and local organizations in the design and operation of programs can build familiarity and trust, ultimately leading to more effective services.

  • Building partnerships outside the medical system: Strong partnerships across the healthcare system ensure that patients have access to comprehensive wraparound services. It is important to leverage the wide reach of primary care providers to disseminate health information; incorporate social workers (and/or case managers and patient navigators) into programs to meet patients’ non-medical needs, and create outreach programs to groups historically hesitant to engage with the healthcare system.

  • Emphasize and incentivize preventive care: Preventive care practices such as check-ups, vaccinations, and screenings can help providers and patients identify health problems early and advise patients about lifestyle changes to improve health. Financial incentives can increase the uptake of preventive care, ultimately improving overall health and reducing costs associated with managing more serious illnesses in the future.

  • Treating the whole person: Patient-centered care models and navigation systems should take a comprehensive approach, addressing an individual’s physical, mental, and social needs along with their medical issues. It is crucial to consider multiple aspects of a patient’s life that can influence care and outcomes, including cultural background and experiences, differing perspectives on certain types of medical treatment, as well as the patient’s family situation.

  • Address fears and stigma: Many individuals, especially people of color, suffer disproportionately from a lack of access to health care and experience worse health outcomes in areas such as maternal and infant mortality, diabetes, and behavioral health. Healthcare systems and service providers must address a range of health fears, stigmas, societal pressures, and adverse childhood experiences and other traumas that may prevent patients from seeking care. Strategies to address this include using targeted messaging and community campaigns to inform residents about commonly-experienced medical issues and their health care options, and employing trauma-informed and culturally competent practices.

  • Ensure health literacy: Health literacy enables patients to understand their care and treatment, communicate with providers, and encourages participation in community health initiatives. All health information materials, including print, video, and digital, should be culturally sensitive and appropriate, in multiple languages that reflect the community served, and easily understandable for different levels of literacy.

  • Offer legal services: Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) integrate legal services into health care settings, recognizing multiple factors that impact health and well-being, especially for underserved populations. MLPs assist patients with debt and bankruptcy issues, insurance claims, data protection, and more. They typically operate on-site within hospitals and clinics, often in collaboration with legal aid organizations, law schools, private law firms, and/or other legal service providers, and as part of mobile services. These programs can also help patients address legal issues concerning housing, public benefits, social services, and food assistance.

  • Patients: Increasing access to health care and improving patient outcomes depends on in-depth knowledge of patient needs and circumstances, including insurance coverage and access preferences (such as in-person or virtual care). Using patient surveys, questionnaires, and feedback to adjust and upgrade accessibility and navigation systems helps meet patient needs and identify cultural practices that medical providers need to be aware of.

  • Caregivers: Family members and other caregivers play a crucial role in a patient’s health outcomes and well-being, and should be integrated into patient navigation systems and other aspects of patient care. It is important to embrace the entire family to ensure that they are not only informed, educated, and aware of health issues but also able to communicate with patient navigators about health care decisions, family risks, and related costs.

  • Medical professionals: Physicians, nurses, and other practitioners who provide services are the linchpin of health systems, managing patient care, diagnosing and treating illnesses, and advising on disease prevention. Medical professionals also contribute to the development of healthcare policies, procedures, and programs to increase access to services.

  • Patient- and community-facing healthcare workers: Patient navigators, social workers, and community health workers provide support to patients and help them access resources, connect to a range of providers, and promote healthy lifestyles. They also advocate for their patients and communities, thereby promoting health equity. Given their proximity to patients, programs should create ongoing feedback loops with these workers to ensure that services are continuously improving.

  • University healthcare systems: Large, university-affiliated healthcare systems have become integral to their communities, providing clinical care and serving as safety net hospitals for vulnerable populations or individuals with limited access to care. They also collaborate with community health centers and organizations, including FQHCs, to expand access to care and specialized services.

  • Health system leaders: To implement or advance patient navigation systems, it is essential to secure buy-in from healthcare leaders, such as hospital or healthcare system CEOs and chief medical officers, state Medicaid directors, and directors of county and state health boards and agencies. These leaders are critical champions of such programs and can help secure funding, encourage broader adoption, and inform the community.

  • Community organizations: Organizations with close ties to community members are in a unique position to build trust with residents to encourage participation in healthcare systems, especially for preventive care. They are often well-positioned to help patients access and understand treatment by providing transportation and translation services, and can advise on the social determinants of health, the non-medical factors that influence health outcomes in a community.

  • Lawyers and legal aid organizations: Laws regarding health care, insurance, benefits, and patients’ rights are often in flux, requiring continuous consultation with lawyers, legal aid organizations, patients, and patients’ rights advocacy groups. Partnerships with legal aid clinics and medical debt relief organizations can ensure that services and information are available to patients.

  • Prioritize hiring that represents communities being served: Programs intended to help patients navigate health systems are most effective when patient-facing staff reflect the diversity of the community they serve, receive comprehensive training in health education and communications skills, are compensated appropriately according to their skills and duties, and are closely supervised and supported through mentorship and professional development. In addition, it is important to integrate these workers into existing healthcare teams and workflows and establish community partnerships to expand outreach and awareness of available services.

  • Emphasize outreach and communications: Effective messaging for community health programs raises resident awareness of healthcare services and health issues, increasing the likelihood of participation. Multi-channel communications, including phone calls, text messages, emails, social media, printed materials, public service announcements and campaigns, and local media, should be tailored to a community’s specific cultural and language needs. Door-to-door outreach and community health fairs, offering screenings and evaluations, are also important.

  • Formulate standardized questions: Because interactions between patients, doctors, and nurses are often time-limited, receiving information and insights from patients in an easily accessible format is critical to assessing individual needs and suggesting further resources. Administrators responsible for patient care, outcomes, and referral services should create standardized templates of questions for primary care providers (PCPs), possibly as part of an AI-assisted system, to direct patients to services both within the healthcare system and outside it, such as housing, education, and more.

  • Seek sustained funding for patient navigation systems: Health access and navigation programs require long-term, sustained funding mechanisms to have the greatest impact. To accomplish this, it is essential to secure multiyear grants and develop public and private funding partnerships that encourage cooperation and resource sharing between institutions (i.e. hospital systems, federally qualified health centers, and local government agencies).

  • Expand training: Allocating time and funds to support existing and prospective healthcare staff to train on new models, services, and technologies helps them stay up to date with healthcare advancements and allows them to better assist patients with diverse needs. In addition, it is common to offer cross-training to navigators from different backgrounds to give them greater expertise and skills in a wider range of specific areas.

  • Health outcomes: Data on changes in patient health status can provide insights into the effectiveness and impact of services and interventions. These could include measures like mortality rates, patient recovery, disease and health trends, and recovery rates.

  • Hospitalization rates: Measuring admission and readmission rates to hospitals, clinics, and emergency rooms is used to assess the quality of care and efficiency of healthcare systems. Admission rates indicate the demand for services, while readmission rates suggest the effectiveness of treatment and post-hospital care, allowing administrators to adapt programming, staffing, and care protocols.

  • Patient satisfaction: Assessing the overall level of patient satisfaction with services provided is critical to a well-functioning healthcare system. Satisfaction with health care services, personnel, ease of access to the system, and navigation of tech tools and communication channels also contribute to a better understanding of patient preferences, providing targeted services, and reducing barriers to care.

  • Social needs: Meeting patients’ social needs is part of a more holistic approach to comprehensive health care. To determine whether needs are being met requires data on the content of social need screenings, how many screenings are being conducted, the rates of completion, and the time needed to address these patient needs through referrals to other agencies and/or service providers.

  • Professional well-being: Because healthcare professionals face high levels of stress and burnout, data on job satisfaction and occupational wellness are critical to maintaining efficient operations and delivery of patient services. It can also help administrators attract and retain staff and create wellness and training programs focused on reducing stress and preventing burnout.

  • Cultural sensitivity impact: Cultural sensitivity programs can help ease patient anxieties about seeking medical treatment and make them feel more comfortable in a health care setting. To ensure that these programs are working, it is important to determine whether patient concerns are being correctly targeted, that the needs of all patient groups are being addressed, and staff are fully trained and continually updated on program changes.

Evidence-based examples

Contributors

Dr. S. Rebecca Neusteter

Dr. S. Rebecca Neusteter has dedicated her career to advancing equity in the criminal legal and healthcare systems. She is focused on reducing criminal legal system contact, disparities, and collateral consequences. She works to enhance public safety, civic participation, and opportunities to support health and vitality. She also served as Director of Research, Policy, and Planning for the NYPD and Director of Criminal Justice for the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, now Arnold Ventures.

Emily Perish, MPP

Emily Perish is the Senior Director of Strategy and Development at the University of Chicago Medicine’s Comprehensive Care Program. She joined the team while pursuing her Master’s of Public Policy at the University of Chicago, where she focused on health policy, inequities, and economics. She oversees the research and clinical teams and leads CCP’s expansion and dissemination efforts. Before graduate school, she managed district operations and strategic development within the Illinois House of Representatives and performed independent research about the use of mobile health interventions to improve maternal health outcomes.

Fredrick L. Echols, M.D.

Fredrick L. Echols, M.D. is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Population Health and Social Justice Consulting, LLC (PHSJC), a business that helps government and non-government organizations alike address the political and social root causes of inequities by using evidence-informed public health strategies. He provides strategic direction and leadership to advance and facilitate the system-level change necessary to improve health outcomes. Previously, Dr. Echols was the City of St. Louis Director of Health and led the city’s response during the COVID-19 pandemic. He also worked as the Director of Communicable Disease, Emergency Preparedness, and Vector Programs for the St. Louis County Department of Public Health and as the Chief of Communicable Diseases for the Illinois Department of Public Health. His passion for public health extends to conducting research initiatives and working globally to improve health outcomes for vulnerable populations.