Job placement services and supports
Last Revised: January 12, 2026
- Outcomes
- High-quality employment
Strategy overview
Increasing employment opportunities for vulnerable groups: Job placement services and supports can help individuals experiencing long-term unemployment train for and find stable jobs, earn a living wage, establish a career, and achieve employment stability. Such practices benefit a range of groups that face unique challenges in securing and maintaining employment. These include workers dislocated due to shifts in industrial sectors, trade policies, and technology; individuals who were formerly incarcerated, older workers, and those with behavioral health issues. Proven practices include skills training, individual placement and support services, counseling and training, and ongoing follow-ups to ensure job retention.
Tailor support to specific needs: Effective programs tend to provide services tailored to a range of needs, including low-intensity training in “soft skills” such as resume writing, mock job interviews, workplace conflict resolution, and career counseling. More intensive services are likely to include credentialed training and education courses, internships, and work-based learning opportunities.
Addressing behavioral health needs: People with behavioral health challenges often struggle to access jobs and remain in the workforce. Individual placement and support programs can play a crucial role in assisting these individuals with multi-tiered support systems. Programs serving this population generally feature case managers with small caseloads and staff with mental health training and experience.
Promoting second-chance employment: Formerly incarcerated individuals face high barriers to employment, often due to persistent stigma and a lack of academic or workforce credentials. “Second-chance” programs for these individuals often offer immediate access to transitional work, which matches people with jobs and pays their salaries. Counseling and other social service supports, such as vocational training, help participants establish stability and gain confidence before they are ready to enter the private labor market.
Multiple systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials of job placement services and supports found that they were associated with higher earnings and more stable employment for displaced workers, adults experiencing long-term unemployment, or individuals with mental or behavioral health challenges.
A 2022 meta-analysis of individual placement and support (IPS) programs found that they improve employment outcomes for participants across all subgroups. They are most effective for individuals with mental health challenges.
A 2021 systematic review of job placement services for individuals with serious mental illness found that, relative to participants receiving standard services, individual placement and support participants had improved employment outcomes after 18 months.
A 2014 systematic review found that the individual placement and support model demonstrated positive effects on hours worked and wages for individuals with substance use and/or mental disorders.
A 2025 randomized controlled trial of Wisconsin’s Reemployment and Eligibility Assessment Program (RESEA) found that RESEA participation reduced unemployment insurance (UI) duration by 0.60 weeks on average, a 5% reduction relative to the mean UI duration for the control group, resulting in reduced benefits collected per participant by $182.
A 2022 randomized controlled trial of Nevada’s Reemployment and Eligibility Assessment Program (RESEA) found that RESEA participants earned an average of 15 percent more over a 36 month period than did members of the control group. RESEA participants also received an average of 9 percent less in unemployment insurance benefits compared to members of the control group.
A 2021 randomized controlled trial evaluating job placement services provided by the Adult and Dislocated Worker programs found that intensive, personalized services increased earnings over a three-year follow-up period.
A 2017 randomized controlled trial of 30 Local Workforce Investment Areas from across the United States found that Workforce Investment Act services increased participant hours worked, likelihood of completing a training program, and likelihood of receiving a credential.
A 2016 quasi-experimental study of the impact of the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model for individuals with severe mental illness found that IPS participants had a 40 percent higher employment rate than non participants after one year and remained employed on average for 18 more weeks than non participants with severe mental illness.
A 2010 randomized controlled trial found that the Riverside Post-Assistance Self-Sufficiency intervention increased participants’ earnings by $967 and their likelihood of employment by 3.7 percent four years after engaging with the program.
Before making investments in this strategy, city and county leaders should ensure this strategy addresses local needs.
The Urban Institute has developed an indicator framework to help local leaders assess conditions related to upward mobility, identify barriers, and guide investments to address these challenges. These indicator frameworks can serve as a starting point for self-assessment, not as a comprehensive evaluation, and should be complemented by other forms of local knowledge.
The Urban Institute's Upward Mobility Framework identifies a set of key local conditions that shape communities’ ability to advance upward mobility and racial equity. Local leaders can use the Upward Mobility Framework to better understand the factors that improve upward mobility and prioritize areas of focus. Data reports for cities and counties can be created here.
Several indicators in the Upward Mobility Framework may be improved with investments in job placement services and supports. To measure these indicators and determine if investments in these interventions could help, examine the following:
Employment opportunities: Ratio of pay on an average job to the cost of living. These data are available from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.
Access to jobs paying a living wage: Employment-to-population ratio for adults ages 25 to 54. These data are available from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey and the Bureau of Labor and Statistics’ Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
Opportunities for income: Household income at 20th, 50th, and 80th percentiles. These data are available from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Financial security: Share of households with debt in collections. These data are available from the Urban Institute’s Debt in America website.
Mathematica's Education-to-Workforce (E-W) Indicator Framework helps local leaders identify the data that matter most in helping students and young adults succeed. Local leaders can use the E-W framework to better understand education and workforce conditions in their communities and to identify strategies that can improve outcomes in these areas.
Several indicators in the E-W Framework may be improved with investments in job placement services and supports. To measure these indicators and determine if investments in this strategy could help, examine the following:
- Access to in-demand CTE pathways: Number and percentage of CTE program offerings considered “in demand”.
- CTE pathway concentration: Percentage of CTE students who earn at least 12 credits within a CTE program, or complete such a program if it encompasses fewer than 12 credits in total.
Expenditures on workforce development programming: The amount of funding dedicated to workforce development programs as a percentage of total educational funding in a state.
Industry-recognized credential: Percentage of program participants who have completed at least one industry-recognized credential.
Successful career transition after high school: Percentage of high school graduates enlisted in the military, enrolled in an apprenticeship program, enrolled in noncredit career and technical education (CTE) courses, or employed and earning at least the median annual full-time earnings for high school graduates ($35,000 per year) before October 31 following graduation.
Include job coaching and navigation services: Effective programs almost always offer robust coaching programs that help individuals identify goals, develop necessary skills, create an actionable plan, and review progress toward finding and securing a job. Once a participant secures a job, programs help participants navigate issues such as health insurance, childcare, and job-related challenges that may arise.
Lower barriers to training and employment: In addition to traditional job search assistance and coaching, effective programs tend to provide participants with comprehensive support services to lower barriers to employment. These may include computer access and technology training, transportation subsidies, mental health counseling, and financial support for housing, education, and health care. Childcare assistance is also essential for parents and guardians to participate in training and find and maintain employment.
Provide long-term workplace support: Effective programs generally provide services that extend beyond a participant receiving a job offer. Many models help participants navigate various aspects of the workplace, prepare for performance reviews, request a salary review, or change jobs internally. These also include soft skills coaching that can boost retention in the first six months of hire. Long-term support also builds a trusting relationship between the individual and support services.
Create incentive and reward programs: To help individuals persist through training and improve opportunities for employment, some programs leverage financial incentives and rewards. Paying participants to attend training or coaching sessions or providing payments as participants make progress toward a goal (such as completing a high school diploma or obtaining a credential through a training course) can increase the likelihood of positive outcomes. This strategy should be tailored to fit an individual’s specific circumstances, motivations, and employment goals.
- Know the community: Job placement programs are most effective when service providers have extensive knowledge of the communities they serve and the experiences of those who live there. Understand a community’s history, culture, demographic makeup, and specific employment challenges, and adapt programming to accommodate unique needs, such as in urban and rural areas and Native American communities.
- Strive for language and cultural competency: Client-facing staff and job placement providers should have sufficient language skills and fluency to effectively communicate with their clients. Salary incentives can be utilized to hire multilingual case managers to support clients in their native language and to demonstrate the value placed on cultural competency.
- Increase access to services: Job placement offices are typically in fixed locations, which may be difficult for many individuals to reach, or in communities with a population that is hesitant about accessing government services. Mobile facilities, such as services-loaded buses, can be used in both urban and rural settings to reach people in these communities. Virtual consultations, training, and educational programs can also be useful.
- Reduce bias against second-chance hires: Many employers may struggle to hire second-chance candidates, due to legal restrictions on the nature of the person’s conviction, licensing requirements for specific roles, or broader bias toward the formerly incarcerated. Placement agencies emphasize the experience and capabilities of their clients and their desire to work, regardless of their incarceration background. Agencies and advocacy groups can also work with government officials and labor offices to examine and, if possible, change requirements to make certain job categories less restrictive.
Workers: Including workers’ voices is critical to job placement programs because it ensures that strategies are grounded in their experience, address the real barriers that individuals face, and provide support tailored to their needs. This will also build trust with the coaching workforce, increase effectiveness, and lead to better long-term outcomes.
Workforce development boards: Workforce development boards are public-private partnerships that connect job seekers with training and employment opportunities, and are essential components of regional workforce programs. The boards include a majority from the business sector, along with representatives from labor organizations, educational institutions, and community-based groups.
Companies: Employers must be fully engaged in creating opportunities for individuals facing barriers to work. Private businesses can help program operators help understand industry needs and the skills participants need to be productive employees.
Elected officials: Government officials oversee workforce development boards, appoint members, approve plans, and secure funding and resources. They also coordinate the efforts of federal, state, city, and local agencies, as well as the business community, and champion the importance of training and hiring workers who face challenges in the job market.
Youth: Many young people struggle to find employment, often due to limited access to education and skills training. To help reduce long-term youth unemployment, it is important to involve youth and youth-serving nonprofits and advocates. This can ensure that programs are aligned with the needs of young people.
The justice system: Probation and parole officers are directly involved with community supervision and rehabilitation programs and are essential partners in helping individuals find employment. They are uniquely positioned to assess client needs, evaluate their skills and work experience, and provide referrals to program providers.
Understand employers’ needs: Evidence-based programs generally leverage in-depth knowledge of an employer’s corporate culture, working conditions, business model, along with their current and future labor requirements. This helps case managers identify and propose job matches that are best suited for both the employee and the employer, and over time helps build a strong relationship with the company.
Expand awareness of opportunities: Given that some target populations may be difficult to reach, it is critical for programs to establish a social media presence that raises awareness of available opportunities, especially when trying to reach younger clients. Marketing campaigns should be in a variety of languages and include both digital and in-person events, such as job fairs.
Create a network of second-chance employers: Target potential employers for inclusion in second-chance hiring programs, emphasizing the benefits for the individual, the company, and the community. Work with employers to identify potential job entry points and develop training, coaching, and support programs to help participants succeed at the company.
Job training: Data on job training programs—including the types of skills and education offered, how many individuals express interest, attend, and complete the program, and with what type of credential, such as state or national—helps providers determine the demand for and effectiveness of offerings. This information can be used to adjust, add, or replace offerings as the job environment and labor market change. Experts note that this information can be hard to come by, particularly for private training providers who cannot readily access public administrative databases.
Placement: Program managers at placement agencies need to know how many individuals are referred for a specific job, the success rate for placement, and why a candidate is accepted or rejected. They also require data on overall referral numbers and the companies and industries targeted to understand hiring trends. This is particularly important in second-chance hiring, in which it is more difficult to place candidates with a higher barrier to employment.
Retention: Data on how many people retain or stay in a job, switch positions for which they were trained, or migrate to another employer provides insights into placement policies and company hiring practices. It also helps program managers adapt navigation strategies to help workers overcome job challenges.
Wages and benefits: Wage growth and the job-related benefits that an individual receives are critical to job satisfaction, retention, and advancement. It is important to track and categorize the type of wage—such as living, minimum, or better wage—and wage increases or declines over time, and if the person has access to benefits, including health insurance, and understands how to apply for benefits such as Medicaid. Experts say this data is not always easily accessible, and may be limited concerning the type of data collected, the level of detail, and for what original purpose.
Communities: Job placement agencies and workforce development boards are deeply rooted in communities and need data on whether their policies and practices are effectively serving all residents. These services must be geared to community members with a range of different needs, in various languages, and be culturally sensitive.
Resources
Evidence-based examples
|
|
Outcome Area |
This ranking reflects how these approaches are scored in one of the major government- or philanthropy-led clearinghouse resources. For more: https://catalog.results4americ... |
|---|---|---|
|
Accelerating Opportunity (AO) responds to the need for improved pathways from adult basic education to valuable credentials in the labor market.
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation High-quality employment |
|
|
Supportive services aimed to increase participants' employment and earnings
|
High-quality employment |
|
|
Connects adults to demand-driven, job-specific training and career and technical education
|
Stable and healthy families High-quality employment |
Evidence varies across specific models |
|
Bridges to Success (BtS) is a comprehensive case management (CCM) program that tailors assistance to the goals of individual beneficiaries with the aim of alleviating poverty.
|
|
|
|
The Career Readiness Training Program (CRTP) is a workforce training program for survivors of domestic violence.
|
High-quality employment |
|
|
iFoster Jobs is a workforce readiness program for young people with histories of foster care.
|
High-quality employment |
|
|
Jobs-Plus is a place-based workforce development program for public housing communities.
|
High-quality employment |
|
|
A program to help young people with disabilities navigate the transition out of high school and into college or the workforce.
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation High-quality employment |
|
|
Mentoring Youth to Inspire Meaningful Employment (MY TIME) is a career readiness program for foster youth.
|
High-quality employment |
|
|
Provides job search assistance and unemployment eligibility reviews to recipients of unemployment benefits
|
High-quality employment |
|
|
Padua is a wrap-around case management program for low-income individuals and families, and it aims to help participants identify barriers to self-sufficiency and overcome them.
|
|
|
|
ReHire Colorado is an employment program that matches participants with temporary employment and offers career development opportunities in order to combat barriers to employment.
|
|
|
|
The Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) is a federal workforce program that places seniors in community service assignments with subsidized employment.
|
|
|
|
Through a supported employment intervention, participants receive rapid job search and individualized job placement services
|
High-quality employment |
|
|
Text messages incorporated into workforce programming outreach to promote youth engagement.
|
High-quality employment |
|
|
Prevents youth disconnection through work readiness training, paid internships, and mentoring
|
High school graduation High-quality employment |
|
|
Individualized coaching for low-income students to review financial need and academic and employment goals
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Contributors
Jessica Valand
Jessica Valand serves as the Managing Director of the Multistate Data Collaborative at the National Association of State Workforce Agencies, leading a national initiative aimed at enhancing mobility-focused policy using administrative data. Prior roles include Acting Vice President and Director at Results for America, where Jessica significantly scaled workforce strategies and fostered partnerships to improve economic mobility outcomes. Earlier positions at the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment and the Colorado Department of Human Services involved overseeing workforce systems and managing economic opportunity programs during challenging periods, including the COVID-19 pandemic. She is an alumnus of the University of Denver with a master’s in development economics and Colorado Christian University with a Bachelor's in Global Political Economy.
Karen Pennington
Karen Pennington is the Executive Director of Madison Strategies Group, a Tulsa-based nonprofit that connects individuals with quality education and employment opportunities, maximizing their unique talents to achieve advancement and independence. In partnership with Retrain Tulsa, a new initiative that combines several elements of evidence-based workforce training and upskilling programs into a single hub, the program is dedicated to delivering results in a highly collaborative effort to address current gaps and mismatches in the local labor market. This innovative approach is a collaboration between private training organizations, multiple workforce agencies, non-profits, and the City of Tulsa and will provide participants with a wide range of interventions, ranging from assessments and soft skills learning to technical training and specific job-search strategies and counseling.
Dane Worthington
Dane Worthington is Director, Economic Opportunity, Center for Employment Opportunities, CEO, a nonprofit that provides immediate, effective, and comprehensive employment services exclusively to people recently released from incarceration. Dane launched CEO’s Economic Mobility unit and has overseen all aspects of CEO’s upskilling programming for the last six years. His work at CEO has integrated technical skill training into the program nationally resulting in thousands of participants gaining credentials resulting in better employment outcomes. He brings economic development experience to CEO from his prior roles where he created Higher Education programs and published workforce policy recommendations. Dane holds a Master’s Degree in International Business from Copenhagen Business School and a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Colorado.