College access and readiness supports
Last Revised: July 15, 2025
Strategy overview
- Eliminating barriers: With only 62% of high school graduates continuing to postsecondary education, college access support programs are more critical than ever. These initiatives typically provide supports to high school and postsecondary students facing barriers related to admissions, tuition, academic and non-academic college preparedness skills, and more. Services often focus on underrepresented groups, such as first-generation students, low-income families, and English language learners, who are experiencing the college admissions process and college-level academic challenges for the first time.
- Delivering the model: Services are generally anchored by a dedicated coach, who may be an on-site employee at a high school or college or off-site as an employee of a nonprofit program. Coaches and mentors typically spend most of their time in individual sessions with students or families, offering step-by-step guidance on college choices, admissions, financing, enrollment, progress, and persistence to reach graduation. Coaches may also participate in and coordinate programming with local high schools, campus offices for financial services, and community-based organizations.
- Experiencing college in high school: Dual-enrollment programs allow students to participate in university classes before graduating from high school. This high-intensity practice, which is often subsidized or tuition-free, gives them a head start in accruing college credits and can help them ease the transition and gain familiarity with the academic and emotional rigor of full-time college enrollment.
- Helping families prepare financially and culturally: College access supports often focus on the most common barriers to college: high tuition and living expenses for students and families. Programs aim to reduce financial stress through direct scholarships, stipends for college costs (e.g., transportation or books), financial planning assistance, referrals to external funding streams, and administrative assistance with complicated financial forms, such as FAFSA. Programs also acquaint students and their families with the culture of higher education and what they might expect in a college setting.
- Providing wraparound services: In addition to offering specialized academic help and referrals to campus-based programs, coaches and mentors build relationships with non-academic service providers in areas such as financial aid, housing, health care, and food assistance. Coaches are responsible for cultivating a robust referral network to ensure that student needs are met and can be adapted as they change.
Multiple rigorous evaluations of college access and readiness programs have demonstrated positive, statistically significant effects on college enrollment and completion.
A 2024 meta-analysis of college access and readiness programs found that advising programs resulted in a 3-10 percentage point increase in completion
A 2022 research synthesis found that well-designed college access programs are associated with increases in college enrollment and graduation.
A 2019 systematic review found that outreach programs that include active counseling or simplifying college application processes are effective in increasing students’ access to higher education, especially on the enrollment rates of disadvantaged students.
A 2012 meta-analysis estimated that college access programs, on average, increase enrollment in 2 or 4 year programs by 12 percent.
A 2013 evaluation of the College Readiness for Rural Youth Program in Ohio found that the program increased knowledge of college admissions and financial aid.
A 2020 evaluation of College Possible’s College Access Program found that the program increased enrollment at four-year colleges by more than 15 percentage points and returned significant benefits per dollar spent from Federal and philanthropic funders.
A 2024 Brookings Institution analysis of college affordability found that higher income families are borrowing more to afford college while lower income families are relying more on contributions from student earnings.
A 2023 analysis of college enrollment and readiness trends found that more socioeconomically advantaged students are 38 percentage points more likely to go to college than the most disadvantaged students, although enrollment gaps by socioeconomic status are smaller among students with similar academic preparation.
A 2024 report on college affordability in different US states notes the large differences in affordability at public institutions across different US states, with the highest state costing 43 percent more than the lowest state.
Before making investments in this strategy, city and county leaders should ensure it addresses local needs.
The Urban Institute and Mathematica have developed indicator frameworks to help local leaders assess conditions related to upward mobility, identify barriers, and guide investments to address these challenges. These indicator frameworks can serve as a starting point for self-assessment, not as a comprehensive evaluation, and should be complemented by other forms of local knowledge.
The Urban Institute's Upward Mobility Framework identifies a set of key local conditions that shape communities’ ability to advance upward mobility and racial equity. Local leaders can use the Upward Mobility Framework to better understand the factors that improve upward mobility and prioritize areas of focus. Data reports for cities and counties can be created here.
Several indicators in the Upward Mobility Framework may be improved with investments in high-quality programs. To measure these indicators and determine if investments in this strategy could help, examine the following:
Preparation for college: Percent of 19- and 20-year-olds with a high school degree. This is available from the American Community Survey.
Employment opportunities: Ratio of pay on an average job to the cost of living. These data are available from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.
Social capital: Number of membership associations per 10,000 people and the ratio of residents’ Facebook friends with higher socioeconomic status to their Facebook friends with lower socioeconomic status. These data are available from the Census Bureau’s County Business Patterns and Opportunity Insights’ Social Capital Atlas, respectively.
Mathematica's Education-to-Workforce (E-W) Indicator Framework helps local leaders identify the data that matter most in helping students and young adults succeed. Local leaders can use the E-W framework to better understand education and workforce conditions in their communities and to identify strategies that can improve outcomes in these areas.
Several indicators in the E-W Framework may be improved with investments in high-quality programs. To measure these indicators and determine if investments in this strategy could help, examine the following:
Access to college and career advising: Ratio of number of students to number of full-time equivalent (FTE) counselors or percentage of students using academic advising and career counseling services.
Access to college preparatory coursework: Percentage of high schools offering college preparatory coursework, such as four years of English, four years of math, three years of laboratory science, and more.
College preparatory coursework completion: Percentage of high school graduates who successfully complete the coursework required for admission to a four-year college or university.
FAFSA completion: Percentage of grade 12 students who complete the FAFSA by June 30.
SAT and ACT participation and performance: Percentage of grade 11–12 students who earn a “college-ready” score, based on the benchmarks set by the SAT and ACT.
Holistic, student-centered approach: Successful programs take a comprehensive approach to helping students access and stay in college. They generally focus on four essential components, ensuring students are 1) progressing in their studies and class work (or determining whether they need tutoring and counseling); 2) are identifying and accessing financial aid opportunities on time and meeting application requirements; 3) are taking the right classes, accumulating credits, and building the skills for a career and employability; and 4) are balancing life needs and priorities while coping with the college setting. The student is at the center of all these services, with the coach paying close attention to any changes or problems that students encounter.
Long-term, consistent relationships with students: Experts say that building a long-term advisory relationship with a student from their junior year in high school through at least the first year of college provides important benefits as they transition to a new school and living situation. This includes helping a student decide which colleges to apply to, understanding the application process, and writing application essays. In college, they help students navigate what can be a disorienting environment and any emotional problems that arise. In addition, summer programs that bridge high school and college help prepare students for a new learning situation so they feel more comfortable and confident.
Continuous evaluation: Developing an infrastructure to collect data for ongoing program evaluation and improvement protocols is necessary to assess whether models are meeting the constantly changing needs of students. Such routine evaluations and research provide insight into the effectiveness of programs and their impact on students and inform ways to adapt to new situations, such as switching to virtual classes during a pandemic lockdown.
Harnessing community assets: Effective programs should collaborate with organizations and services that already exist in their community, including food assistance, health, behavioral care, and emergency funding. To do this, initiatives can benefit from an early asset mapping exercise, which can build understanding of the local landscape and enable relationship building.
Identify specific challenges for individual students: A first step for creating successful programs is to clearly define the students who require services and their needs, and build services around them. For most college access programs, this means students of color from low-income backgrounds and those who are the first in their families to attend college. Students may be unsheltered, require food assistance, and/or struggle to meet work and family obligations in addition to school.
Considerations for rural students: Students from rural areas face unique barriers to accessing college and succeeding. Not only can they be economically and academically disadvantaged, but post-secondary opportunities will often be far away from their homes. Programs should be customized to meet these needs, with an emphasis on providing financial and transportation support, and integrating them into college social life, among other supports.
Students: While a student’s academic performance is critical to success at school, programs must also engage students to understand their personal and work lives, family situations, and any other factors that influence progress and well-being. Continually assessing student needs, monitoring changes, articulating expectations, and sharing opportunities are essential to the success of college access programs.
On-campus services: Colleges provide support to help students integrate into and adapt to campus life, meet financial obligations, and maintain academic momentum and progress toward graduation. Coaches build strong relationships with these offices at colleges and their leaders to ensure that students are aware of all opportunities and alternatives and can easily access the right services.
Community organizations: Local nonprofits, social service agencies, government offices, and faith-based groups can provide an array of services and supports to students as part of long-term engagement or for emergency funding. These include food and housing assistance, tuition scholarships, and financial assistance for transportation and school supplies.
Community colleges: Community colleges enroll large numbers of students, often from disadvantaged backgrounds, and can provide a pathway for students to enter a four-year college, although only about one-third of these students eventually transfer and fewer than half earn a degree. Collaborative and cohesive coaching teams address known barriers facing community college students and provide support and information on credits, majors, dual enrollment programs, and career opportunities if they choose to continue at a four-year institution.
Address financial barriers: With financial concerns at the forefront of student and family decision-making about college, it is important that they consider different financial solutions, including scholarships and direct funding, and have access to financial counseling and informational resources that explain expenses in clear terms. Programs should help families chart a path to affording college and effectively communicate information about paperwork, upcoming deadlines, and requirements for receiving financial assistance.
Overcome administrative hurdles: In addition to affordability, college access is often hindered by significant administrative obstacles such as preparing for and taking standardized entrance exams, completing applications, securing recommendations, and planning for the transition from high school to college, including an adjustment to living on a campus versus at home. Programs are designed to develop clear and consistent strategies to address common barriers to entry and success.
Engage early: College access supports are most effective when they are introduced to students and their families years before college enrollment; many programs launch as soon as a student begins high school. Doing so allows families to better develop financial plans, lets students shape their high school experiences to support their postsecondary goals, and helps schools set expectations for college enrollment and graduation.
Cultivate partnerships: Building partnerships with individual coaches and mentors, schools, and community-based organizations helps identify and recruit students who face significant barriers to college entry. These partnerships can also inform strategies and tactics used by coaches, such as priorities for individual sessions or recruiting tactics. The partnership also might create a relationship for the student and the school with a 4 year university, to help acquaint the student with academic life and culture.
Persistence: Closely tracking whether a student makes academic progress from one semester to the next and ultimately persists by enrolling in the next year of college is critical to guiding them toward completion and graduation within six years. Experts say the second and third semesters are particularly important, with the gap between the freshman and sophomore years marking a turning point for potentially dropping out.
Debt: Financial concerns are paramount for most students in college access programs, and keeping tabs on debt accumulation, loan repayments, and financial application deadlines helps coaches lower the risk of financial problems for students. These coaches also monitor financial subsidies and interest rates on student loans and can address concerns whenever a student’s debt load is becoming too high.
Credits: To meet credit requirements for degree completion, coaches monitor course loads and credit accumulation to ensure that students will be able to graduate on time. If a student falls behind, they can step in and offer advice on tutoring or suggesting taking summer courses, or other ways to increase credit accumulation.
Positive experiences: Coaches are considered partners with students and therefore need to know whether the particular model they are using is having an impact, whether the student remains engaged, and whether the advice they are giving is productive and helpful. To improve coaching services and inform practice, coaches regularly collect data from student surveys and advisor case notes on their experiences and interactions, and adjust their model in real time.
Resources
Evidence-based examples
|
Outcome Area |
This ranking reflects how these approaches are scored in one of the major government- or philanthropy-led clearinghouse resources. For more: https://catalog.results4americ... |
---|---|---|
A system of school-based supports to promote college preparedness in elementary, middle, and high schools.
|
Elementary and middle school success High school graduation Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Back on Track is a postsecondary student success program.
|
High-quality employment |
|
Providing high school students in foster care with coaching sessions to determine post-secondary goals
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Supporting first-generation students to enroll in and graduate from college
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Feature small learning communities in low-income high schools, combining academic and technical or career curricula
|
High school graduation Post-secondary enrollment and graduation High-quality employment |
|
Online learning platform and community providing subsidized courses and learning materials to students
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
College coaching is a mentorship intervention designed to support high school seniors in applying for college.
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Provides Detroit Public Schools graduates with scholarships to attend local colleges tuition-free and a range of supports once they are enrolled
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Enabling and supporting high school students to take for-credit college classes
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Partnership between high schools and local postsecondary institutions enabling students to take up to two years of for-credit courses
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
ECPI is a financial wellness intervention intended to support parents in saving for their children’s college education.
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
GED bridge programs help students to both earn their GED and successfully transition into postsecondary education.
|
High school graduation Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Career and academic support service programs that recruit and train students who are typically underrepresented in health careers
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation High-quality employment |
Evidence varies across specific models |
JAG is a student success program for students in grades 6-12 and those who are out-of-school or are in alternative education settings.
|
High school graduation Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
A workforce-oriented high school model that aims to reduce barriers to entering STEM fields.
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation High-quality employment |
|
Comprehensive support services focused on community college completion and transition to a career or 4-year institution
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Financial aid for post-secondary students conditional on achieving certain academic benchmarks
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Provide coaching and classes focusing on standardized test materials and test-taking skills
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
STEM summer programs are educational pipeline programs for students who have limited access to STEM learning opportunities.
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Programming focused on college life and resources, academic advising, early introduction to college-level subjects, and training in skills necessary for college delivered to students in the summer before their first term
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Provides counseling and other support students to students at risk of failing to matriculate in the months between high school graduation and college enrollment
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
The Texas Transfer Grant Program provides one-semester grants to students who transfer from two-year community colleges to four-year institutions.
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Provides students with text reminders to complete financial aid forms
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Individualized coaching for low-income students to review financial need and academic and employment goals
|
Post-secondary enrollment and graduation |
|
Contributors

Donna Linderman
Donna Linderman is the Senior Vice Chancellor for Student Success for the State University of New York. In this role, Senior Vice Chancellor Linderman is leading SUNY's systemwide investment through the SUNY Transformation Fund, which is supporting many campus initiatives including the replication of the evidence-based ASAP/ACE degree completion model, upward mobility initiatives, multi-campus transfer partnerships, operational efficiency and essential student supports. Donna previously served as Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs at the City University of New York (CUNY). Linderman was a principal architect of the design and scaling of the CUNY Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) model. Linderman also led the development and execution of CUNY Accelerate, Complete, and Engage (ACE), ASAP at four-year institutions, along with CUNY Start, a nationally recognized initiative to help first-year students with academic gaps successfully enter and succeed in college, and has led successful CUNY system-wide initiatives to improve completion by strengthening academic momentum, reform developmental education, improve educational and employment outcomes for student fathers, and more.
Linderman began her academic career as an Assistant Professor at Brooklyn College and holds a BFA in Drama from the University of Southern California, an MFA in Theatre from Brooklyn College, and an EdD in Higher Education Administration from Northeastern University.

Steve Colón
Steve Colón is the Chief Executive Officer of Bottom Line, a nonprofit that partners with students from first-generation and low-income backgrounds through consistent, one-on-one advising as they work to access college, graduate, and have successful careers. Steve has extensive experience in educational leadership and guides the strategic priorities of Bottom Line. He previously served as Senior Vice President at Teach For America, led programs at College Board, and was an adjunct political science instructor teaching courses on civil rights, race relations, and Hispanic culture.

William Tierney
Dr. William Tierney is University Professor Emeritus and Founding Director, Pullias Center for Higher Education. He is an expert on higher education policy analysis and college access and persistence among low-income, first-generation, and/or students of color. Having spent over two decades conducting research on college access for underrepresented youth, as well as improving the performance of colleges and universities, Tierney is committed to informing policies and practices related to educational equity and postsecondary effectiveness. He is working on projects pertaining to the problems of remediation to ensure that high school students are college-ready, and a project investigating how to improve strategic decision-making in higher education.